The URZI Case: A UFO Mystery In The Skies of Italy

12 11 2010

Possibly the most detailed and close up video footage of UFO ever released:

Share

Advertisements

« »


Actions

Information

11 responses

13 11 2010
Juliano (05:47:32) :

Some of best footage I have seen!

Reply
17 11 2010
Seke (13:55:33) :

sorry but this seems reasonable: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JiBm1_pzZg

great site by the way! always lots of fun stuff!

best wishes

//s

Reply
17 11 2010
Juliano (16:03:36) :

OK I watched it and I must say the footage with the ‘buttons’ was quite un-dynamic. You really did get sense it was dead. However compare with this–what do you think?

Reply
17 11 2010
Seke (17:15:54) :

Well, I really think the button theory holds up, he could easily attache some thin thread and move them a little also sometimes. This guy has supposedly taken hundreds of videos like this, why has not anyone else verified it (with another camera for example)? It would be really easy. I would like to believe but I don’t think there is any proof of anything in these videos…

Reply
18 11 2010
Juliano (02:29:28) :

but the buttons looked obviously static and 2dimensional to me. When you look at his footage do you not see the UFO moving with reference points highlighting this movement? The clouds, and dots on the lenses?

Reply
18 11 2010
Seke (11:43:46) :

I have a feeling we could go on forever :-) Well I admit they look a bit different, but I think it’s because of angle and camera, more shakiness etc. Remember that the debunk was made quickly, work on it a little and it would probably look as good as urzis footage. And again, why has no one else verified? Why do we never see them disappear, only move out of camera? I think all this is highly suspicious.

Also, I wonder what you think about all this Teleomorph?

Reply
18 11 2010
Juliano (11:56:50) :

I have a feeling you want quick conclusion ;)
I have already seen it and given my opinion. I told you about the points of reference missing from the ‘buttons’, which you have failed to address (and it is obviously flat)–the clouds, the marks on lense, and sense of space round the UFOs in the original

It is pointless to say that the debunk can GET better. It is not convincing NOW. Also can’t CGI do most things now—so thats not the point,

Reply
18 11 2010
Seke (13:01:54) :

I don’t know about the points of reference Juliano. They did not strike me as especially convincing, but I could be wrong. I am not an expert and I do hope I am wrong!

Reply
18 11 2010
Seke (13:02:45) :

I don’t know about the points of reference Juliano. They did not strike me as especially convincing, but I could be wrong. I am not an expert and I do hope I am wrong! Then this would be the most amazing and important footage ever!

Reply
18 11 2010
Seke (13:03:23) :

Sorry for triple posting :-)

Reply
18 11 2010
Evan 057 (13:42:57) :

The button theory is interesting but doesn’t quite match the movement and far away appearance of the ‘crafts.’
It definitely could be fake, of course, perhaps with CGI, but usually the animated ones are debunked quickly by 3D graphics experts.
It almost seems to good and clear an image to be real, but there are so many hundreds (if not thousands) of authentic UFO sightings every year I wouldn’t be surprised at this point if it was real. What does surprise me is that more footage like this hasn’t been taken.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

w
Cancel

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: